Title

Objective Measurement of Gait Abnormalities in Huntington Disease using a Shoe-Worn Inertial Sensor (P5.291)

Published In

Neurology

Document Type

Citation

Publication Date

4-2015

Subjects

Huntington's disease, Gait in humans -- Measurement, Gait in humans -- Abnormalities, Inertial navigation systems

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and utility of a shoe-worn inertial sensor to measure gait abnormalities in Huntington disease (HD) in the home setting.

BACKGROUND: Clinical rating scales provide only point assessments of disease-related impairments in HD, lack sensitivity, and require that a clinician experienced in the scale’s use evaluate the patient. A tool that would allow longitudinal, objective, quantitative measurement of impairments may offer advantages over standard clinical rating scales.

DESIGN/METHODS: This was a pilot, single-blind, controlled observational study. Five ambulatory HD subjects and 5 age/gender-matched healthy controls wore inertial sensors manufactured by APDM, Inc. attached to each shoe during waking hours for 7 days. Gait parameters calculated from the sensors included stride length([percnt]height); stride velocity([percnt]height/sec); step duration(sec); double support time([percnt]); pitch at toe off (degrees) and heel strike (degrees); cadence(steps/min); and variability in each of these measures. Following blinded descriptive data analysis by APDM, independent samples t-tests were used to compare means for selected gait metrics between HD and control subjects, and Pearson correlation coefficients were used to interrogate the relationships between gait metrics, chorea score, and Total Functional Capacity (TFC, a measure of disease severity).

RESULTS: Subjects were able to successfully apply, wear and charge the sensors. Blinded gait analysis correctly identified the HD and control subjects for 4/5 pairs. Significant differences were found between HD/control groups in mean(SD) stride length [53.96(9.25), 67.68(7.25), p=0.03]; mean(SD) variability per week (as measured by coefficient of variation) in stride length [28.57(5.54), 20.27(3.78), p=0.02] and pitch at toe off [25.57(4.00), 17.56(4.07), p=0.01]. Lower TFC scores correlated with greater variability in stride length[R=-0.82]; pitch at toe off[R=-0.80]; and increased double support time[R=-0.75]. Higher chorea scores correlated with shorter stride length[R=-0.76]. CONCLUSIONS: Inertial sensors may offer a feasible mechanism to objectively measure clinically-relevant gait abnormalities in HD.

Description

Mahmoud Ahmed El-Gohary and James McNames were affiliated with Portland State University at the time of writing.

Copyright © 2015 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.

Originally appeared in Neurology, vol. 84, no. 14, supplement P5.291.

Locate the Document

PSU affiliates use Find in PSU library link at top.

Unaffiliated researchers can access the work here: http://www.neurology.org/content/84/14_Supplement/P5.291.short

Persistent Identifier

http://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/20880

Share

COinS