Document Type

Article

Publication Date

5-19-2017

Subjects

Gender identity -- Cross-cultural studies -- Hoaxes, Social sciences -- Hoaxes, Social sciences -- Anecdotes facetiae satire etc., Scholarly publishing -- United States -- Hoaxes

Abstract

Anatomical penises may exist, but as pre-operative transgendered women also have anatomical penises, the penis vis-à-vis maleness is an incoherent construct. We argue that the conceptual penis is better understood not as an anatomical organ but as a social construct isomorphic to performative toxic masculinity. Through detailed poststructuralist discursive criticism and the example of climate change, this paper will challenge the prevailing and damaging social trope that penises are best understood as the male sexual organ and reassign it a more fitting role as a type of masculine performance.

Description

The article, “The conceptual penis as a social construct”, published in Cogent Social Sciences on May 19th 2017, has been revealed by its authors as a hoax.

The author's describe their hoax on the website of Skeptic magazine: http://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/conceptual-penis-social-contruct-sokal-style-hoax-on-gender-studies/

© 2017 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.

Peter Boghossian published under the pseudonym Peter Boyle.

DOI

10.1080/23311886.2017.1330439

Persistent Identifier

http://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/20229

Included in

Philosophy Commons

Share

COinS