First Advisor
Robert Strongin
Date of Award
Summer 8-9-2024
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Bachelor of Arts (B.A.) in Environmental Science and University Honors
Department
Environmental Science
Language
English
Subjects
Agnotology, Tobacco, E-cigarette, Industry
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to determine the extent to which the e-cigarette industry follows in the footsteps of the tobacco industry's attempts to disrupt science and cause controversy. Four tactics are described that the tobacco industry uses to disrupt science: funding research that is designed to show results that support their position, criticizing and suppressing research that goes against their position, changing risk assessment and scientific research standards to fit their aims, and spreading data created by their interest groups to politicians and the nonacademic press. Evidence is found to show that both the tobacco industry and e-cigarette industry use these tactics. It is found that the e-cigarette industry attempts to change the scientific standard and spreads interest group data to the public and to politicians in a more subtle manner compared to the tobacco industry. The e-cigarette industry causing confusion and controversy in the scientific field could result in lower scientific standards and a decrease in the health of the public.
Rights
In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
Persistent Identifier
https://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/43673
Recommended Citation
Lewis, Calvin, "Agnotology of the E-cigarette Industry: How the E-cigarette Industry Continues the Tobacco Industry's Legacy of Creating Controversy and Confusion Within the Scientific Community and the General Population" (2024). University Honors Theses. Paper 1605.
Included in
Laboratory and Basic Science Research Commons, Other Chemistry Commons, Other Public Health Commons