Published In
Journal of Higher Education
Document Type
Post-Print
Publication Date
3-24-2025
Subjects
College students with disabilities--Services for, Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, Educational equalization -- United States
Abstract
Inequalities by disability status in college outcomes contribute to inequalities throughout adulthood in multiple domains. As the share of students with learning disabilities and/or ADHD increases on college campuses, research is needed on how best to support these undergraduates, both through formal and informal means. We integrate the social and medical models of disability with data on nearly 17,000 young adults in the US, who typically finished high school in 2013, and find that formal-disability-programming relates negatively to college enrollment but has no apparent bearing on college persistence. Among youth with similar sociodemographic backgrounds and comparable end of high school achievement levels, youth with a learning disability or ADHD who participate in special education during high school are less likely to enroll in college than youth with a learning disability or ADHD who do not. Multiple informal-disability-supports retain a significant relationship with college enrollment and persistence, even after accounting for important potential confounders. These supports may improve college outcomes because they demonstrate the relevance of education for careers (e.g., internships), build dominant social and cultural capital (e.g., high school counselors, career services), build human capital (e.g., college exam prep, academic support for college courses), and increase accessibility (e.g., online programs).
DOI
10.1080/00221546.2025.2463857
Persistent Identifier
https://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/43561
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Citation Details
Shifrer, D., Springer, R., Ellefritz, H. S., & Tilbrook, N. (2025). College Outcomes for Young Adults With and Without Learning Disabilities and ADHD: Formal-Disability-Programming and Informal-Disability-Supports. The Journal of Higher Education, 1–35.
Description
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Higher Education, available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2025.2463857