Plant Health and Greenness of Different Income-level Neighborhoods in Portland, Oregon Using Landsat 8 OLI/TIRS Surface Reflectance

Start Date

February 2018

End Date

February 2018

Abstract

Parks have the potential to play a role in conserving biodiversity as urbanization increases. Motivations for conserving biodiversity in urban areas may include protecting important populations and rare species, creating corridors, facilitating responses to environmental changes, connecting people with nature, providing ecosystem services, and fulfilling ethical responsibilities. The goal of this study is to quantify plant biodiversity patterns and functioning in different types of parks in Portland. A stratified random sampling design was used to select 15 urban parks within the city boundary for analysis based on size, location, and park type (i.e., passive natural, active recreational, and multi-use as described by Weems, 2016). Within each park, data was collected in five randomly selected 20 m2 plots for number of tree, sapling, shrub, and woody vine species and cover, as well as 1 m2 plots of herbaceous species and cover. Additional information was collected on the number of trees, general vicinity, landform, slope, and bare ground. The preliminary results of this study indicate a total of 178 species in 65 plant families, of which 76 (43%) are native, 56 (31%) are non-native, 37 (21%) are invasive, and 9 (5%) are of unknown native status. The study also compares species, cover (i.e. tree, sapling/shrub, vine, herbaceous), and functional groups among the three surveyed park types. This on-going research is supported by the Urban Water Innovation Network (UWIN), a nationwide consortium of universities and partners that seeks to address various challenges to water systems (UWIN National Science Foundation Grant Award #1444758).

Subjects

Habitat assessment, Plant ecology, GIS / modeling

Persistent Identifier

https://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/25652

Rights

© Copyright the author(s)

IN COPYRIGHT:
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).

DISCLAIMER:
The purpose of this statement is to help the public understand how this Item may be used. When there is a (non-standard) License or contract that governs re-use of the associated Item, this statement only summarizes the effects of some of its terms. It is not a License, and should not be used to license your Work. To license your own Work, use a License offered at https://creativecommons.org/

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Feb 5th, 4:00 PM Feb 5th, 6:00 PM

Plant Health and Greenness of Different Income-level Neighborhoods in Portland, Oregon Using Landsat 8 OLI/TIRS Surface Reflectance

Parks have the potential to play a role in conserving biodiversity as urbanization increases. Motivations for conserving biodiversity in urban areas may include protecting important populations and rare species, creating corridors, facilitating responses to environmental changes, connecting people with nature, providing ecosystem services, and fulfilling ethical responsibilities. The goal of this study is to quantify plant biodiversity patterns and functioning in different types of parks in Portland. A stratified random sampling design was used to select 15 urban parks within the city boundary for analysis based on size, location, and park type (i.e., passive natural, active recreational, and multi-use as described by Weems, 2016). Within each park, data was collected in five randomly selected 20 m2 plots for number of tree, sapling, shrub, and woody vine species and cover, as well as 1 m2 plots of herbaceous species and cover. Additional information was collected on the number of trees, general vicinity, landform, slope, and bare ground. The preliminary results of this study indicate a total of 178 species in 65 plant families, of which 76 (43%) are native, 56 (31%) are non-native, 37 (21%) are invasive, and 9 (5%) are of unknown native status. The study also compares species, cover (i.e. tree, sapling/shrub, vine, herbaceous), and functional groups among the three surveyed park types. This on-going research is supported by the Urban Water Innovation Network (UWIN), a nationwide consortium of universities and partners that seeks to address various challenges to water systems (UWIN National Science Foundation Grant Award #1444758).