First Advisor

Jim Beriault

Date of Award

Summer 8-13-2026

Document Type

Thesis

Degree Name

Bachelor of Arts (B.A.) in Business Administration: Advertising Management and University Honors

Department

Business Administration

Language

English

Subjects

brand belonging, consistency, conditioned response, ski culture, symbolic capital, subcultural conformity

Abstract

Purpose: Ski culture sells freedom and enforces conformity. This review asks what unconscious behavioral patterns hold that contradiction in place, and how brands capitalize on it to manufacture belonging.

Design/Methodology/Approach: A narrative literature review across consumer psychology, behavioral neuroscience, sociology, and ski industry research. No primary data were collected. Four accounts of consistency-seeking are synthesized into one framework, then applied to three ski industry cases at ascending scales and tested against a comparative case from Spanish football.

Findings: Belonging is a conditioned response, and conditioning requires a stable stimulus. Consistency is therefore the precondition of belonging rather than a constraint on it. The system holds only while participants do not perceive it as a system. Survey evidence from a Norwegian ski brand shows the cost of breaking that condition: prompting skiers to think about a brand is the one experience dimension that lowers brand attitude. Freedom and conformity are not opposites. Freedom is what a fully absorbed code feels like from inside. Brands can supply that code deliberately, but only at scales where a single actor controls the variables: demonstrable intent varies inversely with the scale of the effect.

Practical Implications: The industry treats consistency as a stylistic preference and novelty as a signal of relevance. The behavioral evidence points the other way. Stability is what conditions belonging, and novelty interrupts the conditioning that belonging depends on.

Originality/Value: The review introduces the scale-intent gradient, which reconciles two accounts of branding ordinarily treated as incompatible. It qualifies Bourdieu's misrecognition condition by showing that misrecognition is load-bearing at subcultural scale and dispensable at campaign scale. It connects a measured brand experience finding to that condition, and it identifies where secondary-source evidence stops being able to support generational claims.

Share

COinS