Narrative versus Nonnarrative: The Role of Identification, Transportation and Emotion in Reducing Health Disparities
Journal of Communication
Communication in medicine, Women's health services, Health disparities, Narration (Rhetoric), Health and race -- Psychological aspects, Cervical cancer -- Prevention
This research empirically tests whether using a fictional narrative produces a greater impact on health-related knowledge, attitudes, and behavioral intention than presenting the identical information in a more traditional, nonfiction, non-narrative format. European American, Mexican American, and African American women (N = 758) were surveyed before and after viewing either a narrative or non-narrative cervical cancer-related film. The narrative was more effective in increasing cervical cancer-related knowledge and attitudes. Moreover, in response to the narrative featuring Latinas, Mexican Americans were most transported, identified most with the characters, and experienced the strongest emotions. Regressions revealed that transportation, identification with specific characters, and emotion each contributed to shifts in knowledge, attitudes, and behavioral intentions. Thus, narrative formats may provide a valuable tool in reducing health disparities.
© 2013 International Communication Association
Locate the Document
Published as: Murphy, S. T., Frank, L. B., Chatterjee, J. S., & Baezconde-Garbanati, L. (2013). Narrative versus Nonnarrative: The Role of Identification, Transportation, and Emotion in Reducing Health Disparities. Journal Of Communication, 63(1), 116-137. doi:10.1111/jcom.12007
NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Communication. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Communication, 63(1), 116-137.