Published In
Educational Studies in Mathematics
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
4-2-2021
Subjects
Network Frameworks -- Pedagogy
Abstract
In this paper, we network five frameworks (cognitive demand, lesson cohesion, cognitive engagement, collective argumentation, and student contribution) for an analytic approach that allows us to present a more holistic picture of classrooms which engage students in justifying. We network these frameworks around the edges of the instructional triangle as a means to coordinate them to illustrate the observable relationships among teacher, students(s), and content. We illustrate the potential of integrating these frameworks via analysis of two lessons that, while sharing surface level similarities, are profoundly different when considering the complexities of a classroom focused on justifying. We found that this integrated comparison across all dimensions (rather than focusing on just one or two) was a useful way to compare lessons with respect to a classroom culture that is characterized by students engaging in justifying.
Rights
Copyright (c) 2021 The Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Locate the Document
DOI
10.1007/s10649-021-10026-3
Persistent Identifier
https://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/35355
Citation Details
Thanheiser, E., Melhuish, K., Sugimoto, A., Rosencrans, B., & Heaton, R. (2021). Networking frameworks: a method for analyzing the complexities of classroom cultures focusing on justifying. Educational Studies in Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10026-3