Intersectional Discrimination and Change in Blood Pressure Control among Older Adults: The Health and Retirement Study

Presenter Biography

Pairing data science and causal inference, my research identifies modifiable population-level risk factors for older adult morbidity and disablement. My ultimate goal is to inform policy and translational research that optimizes health over the life course, particularly for marginalized groups.

Program/Major

Epidemiology

Degree

MPH

Presentation Type

Presentation

Start Date

4-8-2021 10:14 AM

End Date

4-8-2021 10:25 AM

Rights

© Copyright the author(s)

IN COPYRIGHT:

http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/

This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).

DISCLAIMER:

The purpose of this statement is to help the public understand how this Item may be used. When there is a (non-standard) License or contract that governs re-use of the associated Item, this statement only summarizes the effects of some of its terms. It is not a License, and should not be used to license your Work. To license your own Work, use a License offered at https://creativecommons.org/

Persistent Identifier

https://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/35593

Subjects

hypertension, mixed modelling, intersectional discrimination

Abstract

Background: The association of intersectional discrimination (e.g., ageism in conjunction with classism) and blood pressure control in diverse older populations remains unestablished.

Methods: Participants were 14582 non-institutionalized individuals (59% women) in the Health and Retirement Study aged at least 51 years at baseline (76% Non-Hispanic White, 15% Non-Hispanic Black, 9% Hispanic/Latinx). Discrimination measures included the mean frequency of discrimination in everyday life, intersectional discrimination (defined as ascribing everyday discrimination to more than one reason), and the sum of discrimination over the lifespan. We assessed whether discrimination was independently associated with change in measured hypertension status (N=14582) and concurrent medication use among reported hypertensives (N=9086) over a four-year period (2008-2014).

Results: There was no association between the frequency of everyday discrimination and change in measured hypertension in men or women. Lifetime discrimination was associated with a higher odds of hypertension four years later among men (OR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.08, 1.36) but not women (OR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.87, 1.15). Also among men, ascribing everyday discrimination to at least two reasons was associated with a 1.50 (95% CI: 1.07, 2.19)-fold odds of hypertension than reporting no everyday discrimination; intersectional discrimination was not associated with developing hypertension among women (OR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.73, 1.26). All three discriminatory measures were associated with lower likelihood of reported antihypertensive medication use, without apparent gender differences.

Conclusions: Experiences of lifetime as well as intersectional everyday discrimination may elevate hypertensive risk among older men, and decrease the likelihood of antihypertensive medication use among older adults overall.

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Apr 8th, 10:14 AM Apr 8th, 10:25 AM

Intersectional Discrimination and Change in Blood Pressure Control among Older Adults: The Health and Retirement Study

Background: The association of intersectional discrimination (e.g., ageism in conjunction with classism) and blood pressure control in diverse older populations remains unestablished.

Methods: Participants were 14582 non-institutionalized individuals (59% women) in the Health and Retirement Study aged at least 51 years at baseline (76% Non-Hispanic White, 15% Non-Hispanic Black, 9% Hispanic/Latinx). Discrimination measures included the mean frequency of discrimination in everyday life, intersectional discrimination (defined as ascribing everyday discrimination to more than one reason), and the sum of discrimination over the lifespan. We assessed whether discrimination was independently associated with change in measured hypertension status (N=14582) and concurrent medication use among reported hypertensives (N=9086) over a four-year period (2008-2014).

Results: There was no association between the frequency of everyday discrimination and change in measured hypertension in men or women. Lifetime discrimination was associated with a higher odds of hypertension four years later among men (OR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.08, 1.36) but not women (OR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.87, 1.15). Also among men, ascribing everyday discrimination to at least two reasons was associated with a 1.50 (95% CI: 1.07, 2.19)-fold odds of hypertension than reporting no everyday discrimination; intersectional discrimination was not associated with developing hypertension among women (OR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.73, 1.26). All three discriminatory measures were associated with lower likelihood of reported antihypertensive medication use, without apparent gender differences.

Conclusions: Experiences of lifetime as well as intersectional everyday discrimination may elevate hypertensive risk among older men, and decrease the likelihood of antihypertensive medication use among older adults overall.