Perspectives on Medical Bias and Health Inequity Training Among BIPOC Health Professionals
Presenter Biography
Claire Dunlap, Priyanka Gautom, Sydney Ito, and Bradie Winders are graduate students at the OHSU-PSU School of Public Health. Among their individual public health interests, these presenters share the common desire to bring awareness to the challenges and disparities that BIPOC communities face with their research training and further assist in the effort to dismantle systemic racism and discrimination.
Institution
OHSU
Program/Major
Epidemiology, Community Health
Degree
MPH, PhD
Presentation Type
Presentation
Start Date
4-6-2022 2:33 PM
End Date
4-6-2022 2:44 PM
Rights
© Copyright the author(s)
IN COPYRIGHT:
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
DISCLAIMER:
The purpose of this statement is to help the public understand how this Item may be used. When there is a (non-standard) License or contract that governs re-use of the associated Item, this statement only summarizes the effects of some of its terms. It is not a License, and should not be used to license your Work. To license your own Work, use a License offered at https://creativecommons.org/
Persistent Identifier
https://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/40203
Abstract
Background: Implicit bias and discrimination from healthcare professionals is a driving factor in determining the quality of healthcare that Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) communities receive. There is evidence that medical training programs reinforce implicit bias and systemic racism by perpetuating the narrative that race is a biological construct. BIPOC healthcare professionals face systemic racism in everyday life and are also more likely to be discriminated against in educational institutions, the workplace, and as patients.
Objective: Gather the perspectives of early career BIPOC health professionals regarding their experiences of medical bias and health inequity education/training within their respective health professions.
Methods: This qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with purposively sampled participants who self-identified as early career BIPOC healthcare professionals from various programs across the United States. The interviews were conducted virtually through Zoom. Thematic analysis was used to identify key themes.
Results: Eight participants aged 25 to 33 years were recruited and self-identified as Punjabi, African, African American, Hispanic, Mexican, Non-Hispanic or Latino, and Vietnamese. An overall consensus of inadequacy was reported for training and education at both the institution and workforce levels. Common challenges reported at the institution level included promotion of bias, dissatisfaction with protection from bias (worker and patient), and lack of cultural and racial/ethnic diversity within student cohorts.
Conclusions: Early career BIPOC healthcare professionals reported inadequate education and training on medical bias and health inequities. These results may be instrumental in reforming education and training for all healthcare professionals.
Perspectives on Medical Bias and Health Inequity Training Among BIPOC Health Professionals
Background: Implicit bias and discrimination from healthcare professionals is a driving factor in determining the quality of healthcare that Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) communities receive. There is evidence that medical training programs reinforce implicit bias and systemic racism by perpetuating the narrative that race is a biological construct. BIPOC healthcare professionals face systemic racism in everyday life and are also more likely to be discriminated against in educational institutions, the workplace, and as patients.
Objective: Gather the perspectives of early career BIPOC health professionals regarding their experiences of medical bias and health inequity education/training within their respective health professions.
Methods: This qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with purposively sampled participants who self-identified as early career BIPOC healthcare professionals from various programs across the United States. The interviews were conducted virtually through Zoom. Thematic analysis was used to identify key themes.
Results: Eight participants aged 25 to 33 years were recruited and self-identified as Punjabi, African, African American, Hispanic, Mexican, Non-Hispanic or Latino, and Vietnamese. An overall consensus of inadequacy was reported for training and education at both the institution and workforce levels. Common challenges reported at the institution level included promotion of bias, dissatisfaction with protection from bias (worker and patient), and lack of cultural and racial/ethnic diversity within student cohorts.
Conclusions: Early career BIPOC healthcare professionals reported inadequate education and training on medical bias and health inequities. These results may be instrumental in reforming education and training for all healthcare professionals.