Data From: Developmental Change in English-Learning Children’s Interpretations of Salient Pitch Contours in Word Learning
Funding was provided by NSF Graduate Research Fellowship and NSF IGERT Trainee Fellowship grants to C.Q., the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health Award Number RL5GM118963 (which supported student research assistants working with C.Q.), NSF grant HSD-0433567 to Delphine Dahan and D.S., NIH grant R01-HD049681 to D.S., and NSF grant 1917608 to D.S. The authors declare no conflicts of interest with regard to the funding source for this study.
Word learning, Phonology, Prosody, Tone, Language development
To efficiently recognize words, children learning an intonational language like English should avoid interpreting pitch-contour variation as signaling lexical contrast, despite the relevance of pitch at other levels of structure. Thus far, the developmental time-course with which English-learning children rule out pitch as a contrastive feature has been incompletely characterized. Prior studies have tested diverse lexical contrasts and have not tested beyond 30 months. To specify the developmental trajectory over a broader age range, we extended a prior study (Quam & Swingley, 2010), in which 30-month-olds and adults disregarded pitch changes, but attended to vowel changes, in newly learned words. Using the same phonological contrasts, we tested 3- to 5-year-olds, 24-month-olds, and 18-month-olds. The older two groups were tested using the language-guided-looking method. The oldest group attended to vowels but not pitch. Surprisingly, 24-month-olds ignored not just pitch but sometimes vowels as well—conflicting with prior findings of phonological constraint at 24 months. The youngest group was tested using the Switch habituation method, half with additional phonetic variability in training. Eighteen-month-olds learned both pitch-contrasted and vowel-contrasted words, whether or not additional variability was present. Thus, native-language phonological constraint was not evidenced prior to 30 months (Quam & Swingley, 2010). Given the surprising insensitivity to mispronunciations at 24 months, we tested 24-month-olds in two additional experiments, which are reported in Supplemental Materials. Experiment S1 tested 24-month-olds in the low-variability condition of the Switch procedure used at 18 months, finding that—in contrast to 18-month-olds—24-month-olds did not detect switches to the trained word-object pairings when the switches involved either a pitch change or a vowel change. Experiment S2 again used Switch habituation training, but tested children in a language-guided looking test instead of a Switch test (Yoshida, Fennell, Swingley, & Werker, 2009). Again, 24-month-olds showed no evidence of detecting subtle differences in word pronunciations. The data from all five experiments (1, 2, 3, S1, S2) are included in the data files in the interests of transparency.
- The person who associated a work with this deed has dedicated the work to the public domain by waiving all of his or her rights to the work worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law.
- You can copy, modify, distribute and perform the work, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.
Quam, Carolyn M. and Swingley, Daniel, "Data From: Developmental Change in English-Learning Children’s Interpretations of Salient Pitch Contours in Word Learning" (2024). Speech and Hearing Sciences Faculty Datasets. 2. https://doi.org//10.15760/sphr-data.02
Infancy_QuamSwingley_2024_lglStudies_td24_expt2_trialData.csv (39 kB)
Infancy_QuamSwingley_2024_habitStudies_switch_expt3_S1_S2.csv (10 kB)
InfancyRevision-Supplemental Materials-Switcheroo-changesAccepted.docx (1073 kB)
Supplemental Experiment 1