Published In

PsycCRITIQUES

Document Type

Post-Print

Publication Date

2017

Subjects

Discourse analysis, Metaphor -- Research, Metaphor in literature

Abstract

Are metaphorical words and phrases merely clever use (or abuse) of language, or do they tell us something important about human thought and communication? Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT), initially proposed by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson in 1980, claims that commonplace metaphorical expressions like “rising prices” and “a warm relationship” reflect deep conceptual relationships (e.g. MORE IS UP and AFFECTION IS TEMPERATURE) that shape almost all of human cognition. CMT is supported by the “embodiment hypothesis,” the proposal that ordinary language use and comprehension involves areas of the brain primarily concerned with perception and muscle control (e.g. Barsalou, 1998). These ideas challenge core assumptions of traditional theories about both language and mind, and they have drawn intense criticism.

Rights

© American Psychological Association, 2017

Description

NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in PsycCRITIQUES. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in PsycCRITIQUES, 62(41), 1-.

Persistent Identifier

https://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/38537

Download

Included in

Communication Commons

Share

COinS