Sponsor
Financial support from the Danish Council for Independent Research , Social Sciences, Grant no: DFF-1327-0 0 037 ; and the Faculty Enhancement Award 2016–17, Portland State University
Published In
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
Document Type
Pre-Print
Publication Date
2018
Subjects
Ethics -- Economic aspects, Corruption
Abstract
We study the relative effectiveness of extrinsic monetary disincentives and intrinsic non-monetary disincentives to corruption, using a harassment bribery game. In doing so, we also test the Beckerian prediction that at the same level of expected payoff, a low probability of detection with high fine is a stronger deterrent to corruption than a high probability of detection with low fine. In Experiment 1, two treatments are designed to study the effect of a low probability of detection with high fine and a high probability of detection with low fine, on bribe taking behavior. In Experiment 2, subjects participate in the same baseline harassment bribery game either without or after having gone through a four-week ethics education program. Results show that: (a) a low probability of detection with high fine reduces both the amount and the likelihood of bribe demand, (b) a high probability of detection with low fine has no effect on bribe demand, (c) normative appeals of ethics education has a small effect on the likelihood but not on the amount of bribe demand, when measured immediately after the intervention, (d) the effect of ethics education vanishes when measured four weeks after the intervention.
Locate the Document
DOI
10.1016/j.jebo.2018.01.004
Persistent Identifier
https://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/37419
Citation Details
Banerjee, Ritwik & Mitra, Arnab, 2018. "On monetary and non-monetary interventions to combat corruption," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 332-355.
Description
This is the pre published version of the article.
The final definitive version is published by Elsevier. Copyright 2018