This research was supported by the Oregon Transportation Research and Education Consortium (OTREC), the James F. and Marion L. Miller foundation and the Institute for Sustainable Solutions (formerly Center for Sustainable Processes and Practices) at Portland State University.
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Climatic changes, Environmental management, City planning -- Environmental aspects, Flood damage prevention
How will the combined impacts of land use change, climate change, and hydrologic modeling influence changes in urban flood frequency and what is the main uncertainty source of the results? Will such changes differ by catchment with different degrees of current and future urban development? We attempt to answer these questions in two catchments with different degrees of urbanization, the Fanno catchment with 84% urban land use and the Johnson catchment with 36% urban land use, both located in the Pacific Northwest of the US. Five uncertainty sources – general circulation model (GCM) structures, future greenhouse gas (GHG) emission scenarios, land use change scenarios, natural variability, and hydrologic model parameters – are considered to compare the relative source of uncertainty in flood frequency projections. Two land use change scenarios, conservation and development, representing possible future land use changes are used for analysis. Results show the highest increase in flood frequency under the combination of medium high GHG emission (A1B) and development scenarios, and the lowest increase under the combination of low GHG emission (B1) and conservation scenarios. Although the combined impact is more significant to flood frequency change than individual scenarios, it does not linearly
Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union.
Jung, I.-W., Chang, H., and Moradkhani, H. (2011) Quantifying uncertainty in urban flooding analysis considering hydro-climatic projection and urban development effects, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 617-633