Sponsor
Portland State University. Department of World Languages and Literatures
First Advisor
Annabelle Dolidon
Date of Publication
Spring 7-22-2013
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Arts (M.A.) in French
Department
World Languages and Literatures
Language
English
Subjects
Marguerite Duras. Douleur. English, World War (1939-1945) -- Jewish resistance -- France, Psychic trauma in literature, Memory in literature
DOI
10.15760/etd.1008
Physical Description
1 online resource (iv, 95 pages)
Abstract
Published in 1985, Marguerite Duras' La Douleur is a collection of six autobiographical and semi-autobiographical short stories written during and just after the German Occupation. Echoing the French national sentiment of the 1970s and 1980s, these stories examine Duras' own capacity for good and evil, for forgetting, repressing, and remembering. The first of these narratives, the eponymous "La douleur," is the only story in the collection to take the form of a diary, and it is this narrative, along with a posthumously published earlier draft of the same text, that will be the focus of this thesis. In both versions, Duras recounts her last tortuous months of waiting for her husband, Robert Antelme, to return from a German concentration camp after he was arrested and deported for his participation in the French Resistance. Though Duras claims in her 1985 preface to "La douleur" that she has no memory of having written this diary and that it has "nothing to do with literature," when it is compared to the original version it becomes clear that substantial changes in style and tone were made to the 1985 version before publication. Though many of Duras' peers disregarded this rewritten version of "La douleur" as a shameful distortion of the truth, it is my contention that historical accuracy was never Duras' primary goal. Instead, what manifests in these two versions of the same story is Duras' path toward understanding and closure in the wake of a traumatic event. Using a combination of psychoanalytic and post-structuralist theory, I will show that Truth and History are essentially incompatible when narrating trauma. Instead what is central to these two texts is their emotional accuracy: the manner in which the feelings and impressions associated with a traumatic event are accurately portrayed.
Rights
In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
Persistent Identifier
http://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/9960
Recommended Citation
Hunter, Rachel Deborah, "Truth and Memory in Two Works by Marguerite Duras" (2013). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 1008.
https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.1008
Included in
European History Commons, French and Francophone Literature Commons, Jewish Studies Commons, Military History Commons