Sponsor
Portland State University. Department of Speech Communication
First Advisor
Robert H. English
Term of Graduation
Spring 1982
Date of Publication
5-19-1982
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Science (M.S.) in Speech Communication: Speech and Hearing Sciences
Department
Speech Communication
Language
English
Subjects
Children -- Language -- Testing
DOI
10.15760/etd.3165
Physical Description
1 online resource (3, v, 49 pages)
Abstract
This study was designed to determine whether varying criterion for pass/fail on the Mini-Screening Language Test for Adolescents (Mini-STAL) would increase accuracy of predicting outcome of the Screening Test of Adolescent Language (STAL). The Mini-STAL was developed by Prather et al. (1981) to identify rapidly those students between grades six through twelve who are in need of language intervention. Using Prather's established criterion (one or more errors equal failure), the Phoenix school district (Prather, 1981) found too many of their school population (20 percent) were failing the Mini- STAL. Thus, they established an experimental criterion (two or more errors equal failure) to identify those students with language problems. The present study sought to determine what proportion of students with language disorders was not detected by the Mini-STAL and what proportion of students without language disorders failed the Mini-STAL using the two criteria.
Rights
In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
Persistent Identifier
http://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/18361
Recommended Citation
Milholland, Denice Lynn Palmer, "A Change in Pass/Fail Criterion on the Mini-Screening Language Test for Adolescents" (1982). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 3174.
https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.3165
Included in
Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Commons, Speech Pathology and Audiology Commons
Comments
If you are the rightful copyright holder of this dissertation or thesis and wish to have it removed from the Open Access Collection, please submit a request to pdxscholar@pdx.edu and include clear identification of the work, preferably with URL.