First Advisor

Milan D. Svoboda

Date of Publication

5-15-1995

Document Type

Thesis

Degree Name

Master of Science in Teaching (M.S.) in Health and Physical Education

Department

Education

Language

English

Subjects

Walking -- Measurement

DOI

10.15760/etd.6746

Physical Description

1 online resource (2, iii, 32 p.)

Abstract

In the field of exercise science there exists no single best method, or tool, for the measurement of physical activity, in particular, activity in everyday free-living conditions. The pedometer, a tool for recording the number of steps taken by an individual, could potentially measure this important component of free-living physical activity. To establish the reliability and validity of the pedometer, 40 subjects wore two pedometers (same brand) in two consecutive I 0-minute trials during normal daily activity. Both trials were videotaped. Each videotape segment was replayed, the number of steps were counted and this count served as the criterion measure of steps. In order to evaluate the reliability of the criterion measure the researcher recounted ten of the forty trials a second time and performed an intraclass reliability estimate and follow-up ANOVA comparing the two separate counts. This yielded an intra-observer reliability estimate of R=0.99 (F=l .36, p=.27). Data analyses included trial-to-trial comparisons of pedometer recordings, left-toright comparisons of pedometer recordings, and comparisons of pedometer recordings to the established criterion scores. Results of trial-to-trial comparisons yielded intraclass reliability estimates of R=0.87 (F=l .51, p=.23) for the left side pedometer and R=0.90 (F=.97, p=.33) for the right side pedometer; no significant differences were found. Estimates of pedometer consistency (left versus right pedometer) yielded a correlation ofR=0.96, with follow-up ANOVA (F=6.46 and p=.02) indicating significant differences between left and right side pedometers. Comparisons of pedometers to the established criterion scores (validity) yielded correlations ofR=0.84 (F=l .85, p=.18) for the left pedometer and R=O. 79 (F=S. 71, p=.02) for the right pedometer. Follow-up ANOVA indicated a significant difference between pedometer and criterion scores for the right pedometer but not the left. Under the conditions of this study, the pedometer worn at the waist level directly above the left leg provided reliable and valid measures of walking steps taken during typical everyday activities. The pedometer worn on the right side of the body underestimated the number of steps taken. Further research on the influence of leg dominance, surface, shoe type, pedometer brand, and gait is needed.

Rights

In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).

Comments

If you are the rightful copyright holder of this dissertation or thesis and wish to have it removed from the Open Access Collection, please submit a request to pdxscholar@pdx.edu and include clear identification of the work, preferably with URL

Persistent Identifier

https://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/28392

Download

Share

COinS