Sponsor
Portland State University. Department of Applied Linguistics
First Advisor
Lynn Santelmann
Term of Graduation
Winter 2000
Date of Publication
2000
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Arts (M.A.) in Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages
Department
Applied Linguistics
Language
English
Subjects
Language acquisition -- Parent participation, Father and child
DOI
10.15760/etd.3601
Physical Description
1 online resource (ix, 133 pages)
Abstract
The speech that mothers use when addressing adults has consistently been shown to exhibit modifications when the conversation partner is their language-learning child. Fathers adopt similar changes in the structural linguistic aspects of their Child Directed Speech (CDS), but their patterns of discourse remain more of a challenge for the child. This contrast in parental language is thought to be beneficial to the language-learning child: a mother's language focuses on the child as a conversation partner, whilst a father's more demanding language is considered a "Bridge" between the mother's and that of adults in the outside world. With family roles changing in American society, more mothers are working, and an increasing number of men are primary caregivers. As these fathers assume the traditional "mother" role, do they also assume the relevant features of that speech?
This study looked at five stay-at-home and five traditional dad-child dyads, as they interacted in the naturalistic setting of their own homes. By examining specific features of discourse that mothers and fathers use in addressing their language-learning children, it was hoped to discover whether the language of stay-at-home dads is the same as that of traditional dads, or whether it has assumed more of the well-documented conversation-supporting features of mothers' CDS.
The findings of this study suggest that the language of the stay-at-home dad is more sensitive to the child. It was found to include more instances of those characteristics of speech that are considered conversation-supporting (repetition, expansion, acknowledgement and restatement) and fewer of some of those thought to cause, or indicate, breakdown in parent-child conversation (directives, non-acknowledgement and corrections). Surprisingly, the stay-at-home dads also asked more non-specific questions, requested more confirmation and clarification, and asked fewer "wh" and yes/no questions. However, when the actual language was examined, it was found that the stay-at-home dads were using these features in ways not described in the literature, so that these supposedly non-supportive features were actually promoting father-child interaction.
Rights
In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
Persistent Identifier
https://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/40704
Recommended Citation
Barr, Judith Nancarrow, "A Comparison of the Child Directed Speech of Traditional Dads With That of Stay-At-Home Dads" (2000). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 6457.
https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.3601
Comments
If you are the rightful copyright holder of this dissertation or thesis and wish to have it removed from the Open Access Collection, please submit a request to pdxscholar@pdx.edu and include clear identification of the work, preferably with URL.