Sponsor
Portland State University. Department of Applied Linguistics
First Advisor
Thomas Dieterich
Term of Graduation
Spring 2000
Date of Publication
2000
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Arts (M.A.) in Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages
Department
Applied Linguistics
Language
English
Subjects
Mandarin dialects -- Grammar, Mandarin dialects -- Semantics, Chinese language -- Grammar, Chinese language -- Semantics
DOI
10.15760/etd.3626
Physical Description
1 online resource (148 pages)
Abstract
This study investigates the mass/count distinction for lexical nouns, and how this is formalized morphosyntactically in language. English is one language in which a grammaticized mass/count distinction can be seen--though there are varying explanations regarding what this distinction actually signifies. Chinese, on the other hand, is a language which might appear to be missing a formalized mass/count distinction. However, I postulate that Mandarin Chinese does in fact have a syntactic-distributional diagnostic available for teasing apart mass nouns from count nouns.
The diagnostic that I propose for finding a mass/count distinction among lexical nouns in Mandarin lies in the distribution of two measure words, xie and dian. More specifically, I hypothesize that the partitive measures xie and dian have different distributions with lexical nouns. The first one, xie, is postulated to be compatible with all nouns, regardless of mass or count status. The second one, dian, is hypothesized to be more selective, being compatible with mass nouns but not with count nouns. Thus, one might say that English realizes the mass/count distinction in a much more elaborate formal system than does Chinese, but both do nonetheless manifest the distinction.
The results of my study suggest that there are grounds for claiming that xie and dian adhere at least in part to the distribution patterns that I have hypothesized, though the distribution was not as strong in some cases as I had originally thought; in fact, there are possibly other variables--notably size of the referent--that influence the acceptability of these measure words with nouns. I believe that follow-up research, with more tightly-controlled stimuli, is needed in order to find out how reliable the xieldian diagnostic truly is as a means toward illuminating a mass/count distinction among lexical nouns in Mandarin Chinese.
Rights
In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
Persistent Identifier
https://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/40773
Recommended Citation
Goodman, David, "Chinese Numeratives and the Mass/Count Distinction" (2000). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 6490.
https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.3626
Comments
If you are the rightful copyright holder of this dissertation or thesis and wish to have it removed from the Open Access Collection, please submit a request to pdxscholar@pdx.edu and include clear identification of the work, preferably with URL.