Sponsor
Portland State University. Department of Philosophy
First Advisor
Les Swanson
Term of Graduation
Spring 2001
Date of Publication
6-4-2001
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Science (M.S.) in Conflict Resolution
Department
Philosophy
Language
English
Subjects
Conflict management -- Micronesia (Federated States), Mediation -- Micronesia (Federated States), Administrative procedure -- Micronesia (Federated States)
Physical Description
1 online resource (vii, 87 pages)
Abstract
The current U.S. mediation system is founded on a paradigm of individual focus and Western values. This model may fail to represent the various cultural components disputants from more collective cultures may bring to the mediation process. In addition, the U.S. mediation system relies on the collaboration of two or more disputants to confront the issues between them. Again, this model presupposes that confrontation is an appropriate means of conflict resolution.
The purpose of this study is to offer a different perspective of dispute settlement as practiced in the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM). Cultural values that emphasize the social group and such concepts as rank, honor, and humility are evident in traditional mediation practices. The goal of the mediation process in FSM is the restoration of community harmony rather than individual reconciliation. Due to social values that discourage confrontation, individual disputants are not included in the mediation process, but are represented by equally ranking kin members. These families collaborate to reach an outcome that is satisfactory to both parties. Mediation works differently in FSM due to the different conceptions of responsibility and identity. Family, apologies, forgiveness and reconciliation are the key components of the mediation process in FSM, ultimately leading to the restoration of community harmony.
Although the traditional system of dispute settlement succeeds in maintaining community harmony in a chiefdom society, the demands of a state-level government exceeded the traditional system's capabilities in FSM. The implementation of the adjudication system permanently altered traditional methods of dispute settlement in FSM. The adjudication system relies on the testimonies of witnesses, which conflicts with Micronesian values that encourage community equanimity and non-confrontation. However, Micronesians have managed to incorporate formalized aspects of traditional dispute settlement practices into the modern judicial system. The Micronesian constitution requires that traditions and customs be considered during the sentencing process.
The Federated States of Micronesia have a traditional system of dispute settlement and an adjudication system that combines both traditional and Western elements. Micronesians have established a dispute settlement system that sustains both traditional and non-traditional models, balancing community and individual interests.
Rights
In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
Recommended Citation
Cummings, Kris Tina Yurgin, "Traditional and Non-Traditional Dispute Settlement in the Federated States of Micronesia" (2001). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 7085.
Included in
Civic and Community Engagement Commons, Peace and Conflict Studies Commons, Politics and Social Change Commons, Sociology of Culture Commons