Sponsor
Portland State University. Department of Political Science
First Advisor
Craig Carr
Term of Graduation
Spring 1999
Date of Publication
6-3-1999
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Science (M.S.) in Political Science
Department
Political Science
Language
English
Subjects
Nativism, Political culture -- United States, United States -- Politics and government
Physical Description
1 online resource (98 pages)
Abstract
The purpose of this discussion is to dispel the notion that the United States is and always has been a polity grounded in egalitarian ideals and open political processes. We should not ignore or make light of injustices such as slavery, segregation, Eurocentric immigration policies, and social and economic discrimination that have played a major part in our history. If only for the sake of historical accuracy, we should not dismiss these trends as temporary lapses in judgment in an otherwise open and plural society.
Yet some scholars do make the claim that we are a country founded on the ideals of liberty and equality for all, while giving little or no attention to the injustices that many groups have suffered due to the idea that America is a place for some and not others. Louis Hartz in The Liberal Tradition in America and Samuel Huntington in American Politics: The Promise of Disharmony extend such an argument.
Hartz and Huntington and the general idea that we are a strongly equalitarian society will be refuted in the chapters that follow by demonstrating first that our political and social ideals are elastic in a sense and even contradict each another at times, and that even ideas that exclude some groups from full participation have roots in our nation's founding principles. It will then be put forward that nativism, the belief that only those who are native born should be able to fully participate in American society, is as strong a force today as it was when non-Anglo immigrants from China, Italy and other countries were socially, politically and economically challenged for their cultural differences in the last century. Finally, it will be argued that nativism is as much a part of our culture as liberalism due to the burgeoning presence of organized groups such as militias that advocate the enforcement of highly conservative moral values and the exclusion of many ethnic groups from citizenship.
Rights
In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
Persistent Identifier
https://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/44864
Recommended Citation
Wacker, Julie M., "Nativism in American Political Culture" (1999). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 7097.
Included in
American Politics Commons, Immigration Law Commons, Political Theory Commons, Public Affairs Commons