Published In

Npj Climate Action

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2-8-2026

Subjects

Animals -- Ethics

Abstract

Integrated assessment models (IAMs) exclude individual non-human animal welfare, despite clear evidence that climate change will harm billions of animals through habitat loss, extreme weather, and ecosystem disruption. We argue that this is a significant moral oversight. Further, incorporating animal welfare into IAMs is technically feasible, using traditional economic methods or novel ones. Crucially, accounting for animal welfare in IAMs need not undermine considerations of justice for humans.

Rights

Copyright (c) 2026 The Authors

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

DOI

10.1038/s44168-026-00339-5

Persistent Identifier

https://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/44477

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Included in

Philosophy Commons

Share

COinS