Sponsor
This article makes up a part of a larger five-phase project which was initiated by The Nature Conservancy (nature.org) through generous support from the Climate and Land Use Alliance and the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (DDCF).
Published In
Sustainability
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-2022
Subjects
Timber Architecture -- Materials
Abstract
As the population continues to grow in China’s urban settings, the building sector contributes to increasing levels of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Concrete and steel are the two most common construction materials used in China and account for 60% of the carbon emissions among all building components. Mass timber is recognized as an alternative building material to concrete and steel, characterized by better environmental performance and unique structural features. Nonetheless, research associated with mass timber buildings is still lacking in China. Quantifying the emission mitigation potentials of using mass timber in new buildings can help accelerate associated policy development and provide valuable references for developing more sustainable constructions in China. This study used a life cycle assessment (LCA) approach to compare the environmental impacts of a baseline concrete building and a functionally equivalent timber building that uses cross-laminated timber as the primary material. A cradle-to-gate LCA model was developed based on onsite interviews and surveys collected in China, existing publications, and geography-specific life cycle inventory data. The results show that the timber building achieved a 25% reduction in global warming potential compared to its concrete counterpart. The environmental performance of timber buildings can be further improved through local sourcing, enhanced logistics, and manufacturing optimizations.
Rights
Copyright (c) 2022 The Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Locate the Document
DOI
10.3390/su14010144
Persistent Identifier
https://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/37070
Citation Details
Chen, C.X.; Pierobon, F.; Jones, S.; Maples, I.; Gong, Y.; Ganguly, I. Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Mass Timber and Concrete Residential Buildings: A Case Study in China. Sustainability 2022, 14, 144. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/su14010144