Published In

Environmental Impact Assessment Review

Document Type

Post-Print

Publication Date

3-1-2021

Subjects

Land use -- Management -- Case studies, Public Policy

Abstract

Highlights

  • The distances from citizens' addresses to the project were geocoded.
  • Citizen comments either contested knowledge in the EIA or provided missing information.
  • Type of Community → Concern/Type of Information →Project Outcome
  • Contested knowledge on the need for the project was important.
  • Institutional preferences were important in explaining the outcomes.

Rights

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V.

Description

This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in: Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 87, 106534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106534

DOI

10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106534

Persistent Identifier

https://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/35106

Share

COinS