Published In
The Journal of Training & Practice in Professional Psychology
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1992
Subjects
Psychology -- Training, Personality assessment
Abstract
This commentary on assessment training in scientist-practitioner and practitioner-scholar programs examined potential differences between these training models on assessment instruments included in the curriculum, assessment instructors, modes of interpretation, anticipated clients, and service delivery styles. Over time it appears that the potential for difference in assessment training inherent in Boulder and Vail model values has been minimized. If these models for training professional psychologists are to be effective in preparing students for assessment tasks with additional populations of consumers in new service delivery systems, attention to these potential differences in assessment training offers promise for more responsible and competent practice in a democratic society.
Persistent Identifier
http://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/10679
Citation Details
Dana, R. H. (1992). A commentary on assessment training in Boulder and Vail Model programs: In praise of differences! Journal of Training and Practice in Professional Psychology, 6(2), 19-26.
Description
This is the publisher's final PDF. Copyright is held by the Forest Institute of Professional Psychology.