Published In

British Journal of Dermatology

Document Type

Post-Print

Publication Date

11-2013

Subjects

Skin -- Infections -- Effect of antiretroviral therapy on, HIV infections -- Uganda -- Treatment, AIDS (Diesease) -- Uganda -- Treatment

Physical Description

18 pages

Abstract

Background—Pruritic papular eruption (PPE) of HIV is common in HIV-infected populations living in the tropics. Its aetiology has been attributed to insect bite reactions and it is reported to improve with antiretroviral therapy (ART). Its presence after at least 6 months of ART has been proposed as one of several markers of treatment failure.

Objectives—To determine factors associated with PPE in HIV-infected persons receiving ART.

Methods—A case–control study nested within a 500-person cohort from a teaching hospital in Mbarara, Uganda. Forty-five cases and 90 controls were enrolled. Cases had received ART for ≥ 15 months and had an itchy papular rash for at least 1 month with microscopic correlation by skin biopsy. Each case was individually matched with two controls for age, sex and ART duration.

Results—Twenty-five of 45 cases (56%) had microscopic findings consistent with PPE. At skin examination and biopsy (study enrolment), a similar proportion of PPE cases and matched controls had plasma HIV RNA < 400 copies mL–1 (96% vs. 85%, P = 0·31). The odds of having PPE increased fourfold with every log increase in viral load at ART initiation (P · 0.02) but not at study enrolment. CD4 counts at ART initiation and study enrolment, and CD4 gains and CD8 T-cell activation measured 6 and 12 months after ART commencement were not associated with PPE. Study participants who reported daily insect bites had greater odds of being cases [odds ratio (OR) 8.3, P < 0.001] or PPE cases (OR 8.6, P = 0.01).

Conclusions—Pruritic papular eruption in HIV-infected persons receiving ART for ≥ 15 months was associated with greater HIV viraemia at ART commencement, independent of CD4 count. Skin biopsies are important to distinguish between PPE and other itchy papular eruptions.

Description

Authors' version of an article that subsequently appeared in the British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 170, no. 4, pp. 832-839. Published for the British Association of Dermatologists by Wiley. The version of record may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.12721

At the time of writing, David Bangsberg was affiliated with the Centre for Global Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard, Harvard School of Medicine, Boston.

DOI

10.1111/bjd.12721

Persistent Identifier

http://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/18615

Publisher

Wiley

Share

COinS