Clinic Factors Associated with Utilization of a Pregnancy Intention Screening Tool in Community Health Centers.

Published In

Contraception

Document Type

Citation

Publication Date

2-13-2021

Abstract

Objective

Routine pregnancy-intention screening in the primary care setting is a promising practice to help patients achieve their reproductive goals. We aim to describe the utilization of a pregnancy-intention screening tool integrated in the electronic health record (EHR) of a national network of community health centers (CHCs) and identify clinic-level factors associated with tool use.

Study design

We conducted a clinic-level retrospective observational study to assess tool utilization during the first 3 years after the tool was made available in the EHR (November 2015 to October 2018). We describe characteristics of clinics with higher tool utilization (≥90th percentile) versus lower utilization (<90th percentile) and the types of providers who used the tool. We then employ negative binomial regression to identify independent clinic-level factors associated with tool utilization.

Results

Across 194 clinics in our study sample which served 289,754 eligible female patients, the tool was used for 113,116 (39%). Medical assistants performed 60.3% of screenings and clinicians performed 11.2%. CHCs with higher tool utilization rates were more likely to be located in rural settings (RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.07–2.87) and serve patient populations with higher proportions of women (RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.24–1.41) and lower proportions of patients with non-English language preference (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.89–0.95).

Conclusions

Many health centers utilized pregnancy-intention screening after an EHR-based tool was made available, though overall screening rates were low.

Implications

Additional study of implementation strategies and effectiveness of pregnancy-intention screening tools is needed. Implementation of future pregnancy-intention screening interventions must be tailored to address clinic-level barriers and facilitators to screening.

Rights

© 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

DOI

10.1016/j.contraception.2021.02.003

Persistent Identifier

https://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/35342

Share

COinS