The Renaissance Art Market: Economic Relationships between Italian Sculptors and Wealthy Patrons for Marketability
Presentation Type
Poster
Start Date
5-4-2022 11:00 AM
End Date
5-4-2022 1:00 PM
Subjects
Renaissance Market Sculptors Cellini Medici Economics Patronage
Advisor
Jesse Locker
Student Level
Undergraduate
Abstract
The development of Italian Renaissance art heavily relied on the commissions and patronage of wealthy elites, contributing to the evolving dynamics and cultural expectations of the art market between the 14th and 16th centuries through their monetary, social, and political influences. Through secondary research, I aim to explore the economics of this Renaissance sculpture industry through a case study of the relationship between the Italian artist Benvenuto Cellini and the art-sponsoring Medici family of Florence. Cellini’s 1545-1554 Perseus with the Head of Medusa sculpture (commissioned by Cosimo I de Medici) spawns the argument that this wasn’t simply a reflection of political connotations imbedded in contemporary gender conventions, but Cellini also treated the piece to hold a duality by also performing as a showcasing advertisement to future potential patrons. Cellini needed to make a living and fund his lifestyle, afterall. I wonder if this mindset of marketability was common among artists, whether the ability to sell held as high a priority as creativity, and understanding potential conflicts when artistic integrity clashed with a patron’s intended message. I analyze sculptures themselves through a qualitative art history lens in addition to written primary sources such as The Autobiography of Benvenuto Cellini as well as secondary sources, for instance, Nancy J. Vickers’ The Mistress in the Masterpiece. Furthermore, I intend to interpret economic theories (by referring to Classical, Keynesian, Malthusian, and Laissez-faire free-market economics) while attempting to consider the ethnography during this time period to provide context to these theories. This research topic increases in significance when the implications of the modern commodification of art is considered.
Rights
© Copyright the author(s)
IN COPYRIGHT:
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
DISCLAIMER:
The purpose of this statement is to help the public understand how this Item may be used. When there is a (non-standard) License or contract that governs re-use of the associated Item, this statement only summarizes the effects of some of its terms. It is not a License, and should not be used to license your Work. To license your own Work, use a License offered at https://creativecommons.org/
Persistent Identifier
https://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/37507
The Renaissance Art Market: Economic Relationships between Italian Sculptors and Wealthy Patrons for Marketability
The development of Italian Renaissance art heavily relied on the commissions and patronage of wealthy elites, contributing to the evolving dynamics and cultural expectations of the art market between the 14th and 16th centuries through their monetary, social, and political influences. Through secondary research, I aim to explore the economics of this Renaissance sculpture industry through a case study of the relationship between the Italian artist Benvenuto Cellini and the art-sponsoring Medici family of Florence. Cellini’s 1545-1554 Perseus with the Head of Medusa sculpture (commissioned by Cosimo I de Medici) spawns the argument that this wasn’t simply a reflection of political connotations imbedded in contemporary gender conventions, but Cellini also treated the piece to hold a duality by also performing as a showcasing advertisement to future potential patrons. Cellini needed to make a living and fund his lifestyle, afterall. I wonder if this mindset of marketability was common among artists, whether the ability to sell held as high a priority as creativity, and understanding potential conflicts when artistic integrity clashed with a patron’s intended message. I analyze sculptures themselves through a qualitative art history lens in addition to written primary sources such as The Autobiography of Benvenuto Cellini as well as secondary sources, for instance, Nancy J. Vickers’ The Mistress in the Masterpiece. Furthermore, I intend to interpret economic theories (by referring to Classical, Keynesian, Malthusian, and Laissez-faire free-market economics) while attempting to consider the ethnography during this time period to provide context to these theories. This research topic increases in significance when the implications of the modern commodification of art is considered.