Published In
Kybernetes
Document Type
Post-Print
Publication Date
2004
Subjects
Reconstructability Analysis, Information Theory, Probabilistic graphical modeling, Multivariate analysis discrete multivariate modeling, Data mining
Abstract
Modified reconstructability analysis (MRA), a novel decomposition technique within the framework of set‐theoretic (crisp possibilistic) reconstructability analysis, is applied to three‐variable NPN‐classified Boolean functions. MRA is superior to conventional reconstructability analysis, i.e. it decomposes more NPN functions. MRA is compared to Ashenhurst‐Curtis (AC) decomposition using two different complexity measures: log‐functionality, a measure suitable for machine learning, and the count of the total number of two‐input gates, a measure suitable for circuit design. MRA is superior to AC using the first of these measures, and is comparable to, but different from AC, using the second.
DOI
10.1108/03684920410533985
Persistent Identifier
http://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/16499
Citation Details
Al-Rabadi, A., Zwick, M., and Perkowski, M. (2004). "A Comparison of Modified Reconstructability Analysis and Ashenhurst-Curtis Decomposition of Boolean Functions." Kybernetes, vol. 33, No. 5/6, pp. 933-947.
Included in
Logic and Foundations Commons, Statistics and Probability Commons, Systems Architecture Commons
Description
Authors' version of an article which subsequently appeared in Kybernetes, published by Emerald Group Publishing Limited. The version of record may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03684920410533985.