Published In
Media History
Document Type
Post-Print
Publication Date
5-25-2022
Subjects
Silent Film -- Film Studies
Abstract
My research suggests that in addition to local practices, American film historians should continue to be attentive to mass experiences determined not only by location but, in this case, by 19th century periodical reading habits. I focus on the first four years of US public photochemical motion picture exhibition to consider the similarities I found in the use of still photographs to explain and introduce the machines and development processes used to introduce photochemical motion pictures to middle-class reading publics, effectively inviting readers to mentally animate the images themselves in imitatiion of a screening apparatus. I argue that the use of photographs in US magazines, the result of changes in printing practices in the period following the Civil War, shows that in addition to documented exhibitor practices, published magazine accounts also readied potential audience members for the new experience they would encounter by emphasizing the synthesis of individual photographs to create motion pictures. This relationship demonstrates that American periodicals played a crucial role in the way photochemical motion pictures and still photographs were depicted in mass culture to visualize the hidden relationship between photograms once they are placed in motion.
Locate the Document
DOI
10.1080/13688804.2022.2065972
Persistent Identifier
https://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/37912
Citation Details
Borden, Amy E., "Stillness and Motion on the Coffee Table: Photochemical Motion Pictures in Gilded Age Periodical" (2022). School of Film Faculty Publications and Presentations. 25.
https://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/37912
Description
This is the author’s version of a work. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Media History, 1-16.