Sponsor
This research was funded by the National Institute for Transportation and Communities, or NITC, a program of TREC at Portland State University. The project also benefitted from a match from the University of Utah and Cleveland State University.
Document Type
Report
Publication Date
7-2017
Subjects
Transit-oriented development, Transportation -- Planning, Shrinking cities, Housing -- United States, United States. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Abstract
In late 2013, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) launched the Location Affordability Index (LAI) portal. Their dataset uses models to estimate typical amount households spend on housing and transportation at the block group level, and calculates “H + T Affordability,” the percent of household income spent on these items. In our previous research, we analyzed 81 shrinking cities to determine how location affordability differs across various neighborhoods. Our results suggest that households in declining neighborhoods, as compared to stable or redeveloping neighborhoods, face the greatest H + T affordability challenges in shrinking cities. Furthermore, in declining neighborhoods, virtually all of the additional affordability challenges encountered can be accounted for by differences in transportation affordability rather than housing. Since there is virtually no research to either validate or suggest bias in the LAI data, and a declining neighborhood in a shrinking city presents both a relatively common yet entirely dissimilar context to the norm, we feel that this data should be carefully calibrated to, and tested for, this setting to ensure that appropriate and efficient policy follow.
In this report, we present the results of two research phases: a strictly quantitative first stage in which the LAI is disassembled and reassembled, taking stock of assumptions, methods, and accuracy. This work finds that the LAI generally over-estimates housing costs, but more for renters and more in metropolitan areas. Estimations of transportation cost burdens are built largely from unreliable data and using models which cannot be replicated, leading us to conclude that these cost burden estimates may not be reliable. In the second research phase, which is survey-based, we gather household-level data from 12 Census tracts in Cleveland, Ohio, to estimate household housing and transportation costs and cost burdens and gain a clearer sense of budget trade-offs where costs are unaffordable. The survey results support the first research stage. The LAI over-estimates housing costs for these neighborhoods by approximately 17% and transportation costs by approximately 126%, meaning the LAI estimates for transportation are not reliable. By and large, households trade essentials, investing, and paying bills (at all or in full) to cover their costs in housing and transportation.
DOI
10.15760/trec.177
Persistent Identifier
http://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/20745
Recommended Citation
Ganning, J. and Tighe, J. R. What Do We Know about Location Affordability in U.S. Shrinking Cities? NITC-RR-872. Portland, OR: Transportation Research and Education Center (TREC), 2017. https://doi.org/10.15760/trec.177
Description
This is a final report, NITC-RR-872, from the NITC program of TREC at Portland State University, and can be found online: http://nitc.trec.pdx.edu/research/project/872/What_do_we_know_about_Location_Affordability_in_U.S._Shrinking_Cities?
The project brief associated with this record can be accessed at: http://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/20747