Quantifying Post-Disaster Business Recovery Through Bayesian Methods
Sponsor
The Center for Risk-Based Community Resilience Planning is funded through a cooperative agreement between the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology and Colorado State University (Grant Number 70NANB15H044).
Published In
Structure and Infrastructure Engineering
Document Type
Citation
Publication Date
6-2020
Abstract
Business recovery after a disaster plays an important role in the socioeconomic recovery of a community. This study focuses on the development of a probabilistic modelling approach for quantifying and predicting business recovery through Bayesian linear regression. The proposed modelling approach consists of three steps including data collection, development of model forms, and model selection through rigorous evaluation and elimination steps. Four attributes, namely business cease operation days, revenue recovery, customer retention, and employee retention, which describe the post-disaster recovery state of a business, are considered. One of the main contributions of this study is incorporating the interplay between household and businesses in a community in developing predictive business recovery models. Towards that direction, different methods to account for the effect of household recovery into the customer retention rate of a business are investigated and proposed. As an application, the proposed modelling approach is applied on the results of a longitudinal field study at the community of Lumberton, NC, which was heavily impacted by the 2016 Hurricane Matthew, focusing on business recovery. The predictive models proposed in this study may be further applicable in risk-based resilience assessment of communities following disastrous events.
Rights
Copyright © 2020 Taylor and Francis
Locate the Document
DOI
10.1080/15732479.2020.1777569
Persistent Identifier
https://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/36394
Citation Details
Mohammad Aghababaei, Maria Koliou, Maria Watson & Yu Xiao (2021) Quantifying post-disaster business recovery through Bayesian methods, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 17:6, 838-856, DOI: 10.1080/15732479.2020.1777569