Published In

International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2021: Building Sustainability and Resilience with IS: A Call for Action)

Document Type

Conference Proceeding

Publication Date

12-2021

Subjects

Artificial intelligence, Data Science -- methods, Algorithms -- Social aspects

Abstract

Literature on algorithmic bias identifies its source in either biased data or statistical methods, more rarely in the development of algorithmic solutions as a potential factor. Because of the prior unknowability of algorithms, data scientists developing such solutions have to take various design decisions. Drawing from the flow-oriented approach, we study algorithmic unknowability and how data scientists respond to it in 35 public data science Jupyter notebooks containing algorithmic solutions to predict customer churn in a credit card dataset on a data science platform Kaggle.com. We offer a more thorough understanding of the unknowability in algorithmic development that can enable algorithmic bias: resource, problem, dataset, analytical, model, and performance unknowability. We find that in response, data scientists engage in biasenabling interpretation, bias-enabling optionalizing, and bias-enabling experimentation. These findings contribute to literature on algorithmic bias and can help avert bias earlier in practice.

A video of this presentation is available online:
https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2021/ai_business/ai_business/7/

Rights

This is the accepted manuscript version of a conference paper. Final version copyrighted © by Association for Information Systems. Authors retain copyright for material published as part of AIS conference proceedings.

Persistent Identifier

https://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/37039

Included in

Business Commons

Share

COinS