Published In
Long Range Planning
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
6-2017
Subjects
Barriers to entry (Industrial organization), Diversification in industry, Branding (Marketing), Business planning, Intellectual cooperation
Abstract
Innovation has become more open in recent years. Yet the decision to become more open and the challenge of sustaining that openness are not well understood. This is the concern of the “content” branch of Open Strategy, defined as the branch that addresses an organization's open innovation strategy. We examine the initial motivations to adopt an open strategy, and then consider when organizations choose to maintain that open strategy or revert to a more proprietary approach. Similarly, we examine motivations to open up a previously proprietary strategy. We find that these dynamics depend on the organization's desire to either foster greater growth (which favors a more open strategy) or secure greater control and profit directly from the innovation (which favors a more proprietary strategy). Crucially, these choices can shift over the life cycle of a market and are dependent on the competencies amassed by the organization. In early phases, when there are relatively few legacy customers and many new arrivals, open strategies attract customers at a faster rate. In later phases, as the market matures and new arrivals have slowed, there are few new customers to attract with an open strategy and reversion to a more proprietary strategy becomes quite attractive. This suggests that the longevity of open initiatives might be curtailed as organizations opt for value capture over cooperative value creation.
DOI
10.1016/j.lrp.2016.07.004
Persistent Identifier
http://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/18282
Citation Details
Appleyard, Melissa M., and Henry W. Chesbrough. "The Dynamics of Open Strategy: From Adoption to Reversion." Long Range Planning (2016).
Included in
Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons, Strategic Management Policy Commons
Description
© 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
May be accessed at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2016.07.004.