Sponsor
This research was supported in part by Assistance Agreement No. 83575401 awarded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Published In
Building and Environment
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
7-2017
Subjects
Indoor air quality, House plants -- Effect of air pollution on
Abstract
Indoor vegetation is often proposed as a passive approach for improving indoor air quality. While studies of outdoor environments indicate that vegetation can be an important sink of outdoor ozone, there is scant data in the literature concerning the dynamics of ozone uptake by indoor plants. This study determined ozone deposition velocities (vd) for five common indoor plants (Peace Lily, Ficus, Calathia, Dieffenbachia, Golden Pothos). The transient vd was calculated, using measured leaf areas for each plant, for exposures mimicking three diurnal cycles where ozone concentrations in chamber tests were elevated for 8 h followed by 16 h in the absence of ozone. Estimates of vd at the end of the first exposures ranged from 5.6 m h−1 for Golden Pothos to 0.9 m h−1 for Peace Lily. Values of vd were approximately 50% and 66% lower at the end of a second exposure and third exposure, respectively. Estimates of vd were also made for a range of photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) levels typically observed indoors. An increase in PAR from 0.6 to 41.2 μmol m−2 sec−1 resulted in increases in vd ranging from a factor of 1.7 (Diffenbachia) to 4.7 (Peace Lily). For deposition velocities measured in this study, the ozone removal effectiveness ranges from 0.9% to 9% for leaf surface area to room volume ratio of 0.06 m−1 (approximately one plant for every 1.8 m2 of floor area) when accounting for values of air exchange and background loss typical of a residential environment.
Persistent Identifier
http://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/23154
Citation Details
Abbass, O. A., Sailor, D. J., & Gall, E. T. (2017). Effectiveness of indoor plants for passive removal of indoor ozone. Building and Environment, 119, 62-70.
Included in
Engineering Science and Materials Commons, Environmental Sciences Commons, Plant Sciences Commons
Description
© 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).